I COMMEND The Straits Times for highlighting the recent developments in Aware. In the light of the religious affiliations of most members of the new executive committee (exco), I seek answers on the future impartiality and professionalism of Aware's programmes.Will victims of family abuse be given advice and support to leave their families and spouses if it is determined that they are at risk, given the 'pro-family' stance of the new exco? Will rape victims be given access to all options during counselling sessions, including advice on abortion, given the 'anti-abortion' stance of the religious organisations to which many of the new exco members belong? Will sex education programmes include information about the use of contraceptives in the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy, given the 'pro-abstinence' positions of most members of the new exco? Will homosexual women seeking advice and help be supported in their struggle to come to terms with their identity in a supportive environment? State publicly their exact positions on these points pertaining to Aware's social service programmes; and Give an assurance of non-interference in the professionalism and impartiality of Aware's counsellors to provide advice that focuses exclusively on the welfare of clients who seek them out.
Aware's counselling services are often the last resort for many women at risk who need special protection and care.
Some of my concerns are these:
I shall be much reassured if the new exco members:
I seek such answers because the tussle is not an issue of religious versus secular life, or of endorsement or condemnation of homosexuality, or of being anti- or pro-abortion.
It is about transparency and honesty in providing social services and leadership so women can make informed choices about the type of organisation they wish to support and have support them.
Alexandra Serrenti (Ms)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment